· Lokaal
· Balken
Gemiddeld
Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg
📏
6.0 km
Afstand
⏱
1h 31min
Geschatte duur
⛰
Gemiddeld
Moeilijkheidsgraad
➡
Lineair
Routetype
Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg is a 6.0 km Local Hiking hiking route.
This 6.0 km route sits in the sweet spot for a half-day outing — long enough to feel rewarding, short enough to leave the afternoon free. Expect around 1 hour and 20 minutes.
Point-to-point in layout, this trail takes you from A to B across the landscape. Consider your return logistics before heading out. The trail is officially waymarked as Balken, so look out for the trail markers along the way.
This is a Local Walking Network (LWN) trail — a community-level route perfect for exploring the immediate surroundings, popular with locals and visitors alike.
Hoogteprofiel
Hoogteprofiel laden…
Hoogteprofiel niet beschikbaar voor deze route.
↑ Hoogtestijging
↓ Hoogtedaling
Hoogste punt
Laagste punt
Hoogtedata van SRTM via OpenTopoData (open dataset).
Kaart
Bekijken op OSM →Laden…
Routepunten
5 punten langs de routeFoto's
Nog geen foto's voor deze route.
Beoordelingen
Nog geen beoordelingen.
Log in om een beoordeling te schrijven
Veelgestelde vragen
How long is the Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg hiking route?
Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg is 6.0 km long.
How much time should I allow for Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg?
Most walkers allow around 1h 31min for Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg at a comfortable pace.
Is Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg a circular or linear route?
Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg is a linear route, not a loop. Return transport from the finish point is recommended.
Where does Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg start?
Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg starts near coordinates 51.3513, 7.5661.
Is Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg suitable for beginners?
Doppelbalken Mastenberg und Weißensteinweg is suitable for walkers with some experience. A basic level of fitness is recommended.