spotters actief
Dagelijkse Editie
Dagelijkse Editie
Registreren
· Lokaal Gemiddeld

WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route

📏
11.9 km Afstand
2h 58min Geschatte duur
Gemiddeld Moeilijkheidsgraad
🔄
Rondwandeling Routetype

WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route is a 11.9 km Local Hiking hiking route.

Covering 11.9 km, this is a substantial hike requiring a reasonable base fitness. Most walkers complete it in about 2 hours and 38 minutes.

This loop trail is a practical choice for day hikers: you start and end at the same spot, with no shuttle or pick-up required.

This is a Local Walking Network (LWN) trail — a community-level route perfect for exploring the immediate surroundings, popular with locals and visitors alike.

Hoogteprofiel
Laden…

Routepunten

5 punten langs de route
A
Start
0 km 52.0037°, 5.7932°
1
3.0 km 52.0037°, 5.7638°
📍 Spots bij dit punt →
2
5.9 km 52.0144°, 5.7764°
📍 Spots bij dit punt →
3
8.9 km 52.0141°, 5.8016°
📍 Spots bij dit punt →
B
Finish
11.9 km 52.0051°, 5.7917°

Beoordelingen

Nog geen beoordelingen.
Log in om een beoordeling te schrijven

Veelgestelde vragen

How long is the WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route hiking route?
WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route is 11.9 km long.
How much time should I allow for WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route?
Most walkers allow around 2h 58min for WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route at a comfortable pace.
Can I walk WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route as a circular route?
Yes, WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route is a circular route. It returns to the starting point, making it convenient for day hikers.
What are the start coordinates of WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route?
The trailhead for WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route is located near 52.0036, 5.7932.
Is WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route suitable for beginners?
WNW Veluwe - Wolfheze/Buunderkamp - rode route is suitable for walkers with some experience. A basic level of fitness is recommended.